Lucore
Lucore v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL M. LUCORE, Case No.: 3:18-cv-02382-L-MDD
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
v. SECOND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION [ECF No. 37] WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., et al. Defendant. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Paul M. Lucore’s (“Plaintiff”) motion to for to reconsider the Order Denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (doc. no. 35) pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Defendant Wells Fargo Bank filed an opposition, and Plaintiff replied. The Court decides the motion on the briefs without oral argument. See Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. In this wrongful foreclosure action, Plaintiff alleged claims for violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692f, and cancellation of instruments. Both claims were premised on the contention that Plaintiff had rescinded his mortgage loan modification. (See…