Purpura
Purpura v. Does Members of the Inmate Classification Committee
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 FRANK PURPURA, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01688-JAH-BGS CDCR #V-66470,
ORDER:
Plaintiff,
vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
13 [ECF No. 2]; and DOES MEMBERS OF THE INMATE
CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE, 2) DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL
15 Defendants. TO EFFECT SERVICE UPON DEFENDANTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) AND Fed. R. Civ. P. 17 4(c)(3)
19 Frank Purpura (“Plaintiff”), represented by counsel, and currently incarcerated at the 20 Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, has filed a Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 21 § 1983 (“Compl.” ECF No. 1), together with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 22 (“IFP”) (ECF No. 2). Plaintiff claims prison officials at Richard J. Donovan Correctional 23 Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing 24 to protect him from being attacked by another inmate. (See Compl. at 3-4.)
I. Motion to Proceed IFP
26 All parties instituting any…