Savas

Savas v. California State Law Enforcement Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 9, 20203:20-cv-00032California4,040 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JONATHAN SAVAS, et al., individually Case No.: 20-cv-00032-DMS-DEB and on behalf of all other similarly 12 situated, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS Plaintiffs, 14 v.

CALIFORNIA STATE LAW

ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, a labor organization; BETTY YEE, in her official 17 capacity as State Controller of California; and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of 19 California, 20 Defendants. 21 Pending before the Court are two separate motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ claims: one filed by Defendant California Statewide Law Enforcement Association1 (“CSLEA” or “the union”), and one filed by Defendants Betty Yee and Xavier Becerra (the “State Defendants”). Plaintiffs filed an opposition to each motion, and CSLEA and the State

On the docket, Defendant is listed as “California State Law Enforcement Agency,” but refers to itself in its motion as “California Statewide Law Enforcement Association.” 28 Defendants each…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.