Pierson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTINA PIERSON, et al., Case No. 19-cv-1755-BAS-KSC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

v. MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 17)

JANICE E. MARTINELLI,

Individually and as TRUSTEE OF THE

JANICE MARTINELLI TRUST DATED

JUNE 27, 2005, et al., Defendants. 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ second motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 17.) Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint under Rule 12(b)(1), alleging a lack of standing, and under Rule 12 (b)(6), alleging insufficient facts to support Plaintiffs’ claims of discrimination based on sex or disability. Alternatively, Defendants move for a more definite statement under Rule 12(e). (ECF No. 17.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition to the motion (ECF No. 18), and Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 20.) The Court finds this motion suitable for determination on the papers and without oral argument. Civ. L. R. 7.1(d)(1). For the reasons stated…