Rutherford

Rutherford v. Leal

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20203:20-cv-00688California3,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES RUTHERFORD, an individual, Ca se No. 3:20-CV-0688 GPC RBB Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART v. AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO MARIBEL LEAL, an individual, DISMISS ISRAEL RODRIGUEZ, an

individual, PAUL RODRIGUEZ, an individual; and DOES 1-10, inclusive Defendants.

18 On July 31, 2020, Defendants moved the Court for an order dismissing 19 Plaintiff’s complaint for lack of standing and failure to state a claim upon which 20 relief could be granted, and for an order declining supplemental jurisdiction and 21 dismissing Plaintiff’s state law claim. ECF No. 10. On September 4, 2020, Plaintiff 22 filed his opposition, several days after the deadline set by the Court’s order. ECF 23 No. 11. Because Plaintiff filed the document late without seeking leave of the Court 24 to extend the deadline, the document was struck from the record and the Court does 25 not consider it in deciding the instant motion. ECF No. 14. 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.