Spatcher

Spatcher v. Gore

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20203:20-cv-01089California1,661 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY LEON SPATCHER, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01089-JAH-LL

CDCR #BJ-9222,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. (1) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.

SHERIFF GORE;

§ 1915A(b)(1)

JOHN DOE PSYCH DOCTOR,

Defendants. AND 17 (2) DENYING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

AS MOOT

20 [ECF No. 2] 21 Plaintiff Gregory Leon Spatcher, currently incarcerated at the California Institution for Men in Chino, California and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., ECF No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) when he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). / / / I. Sua Sponte Screening Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) The Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1915A,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.