Amend

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PETE AMEND, Case No.: 20cv1566-LL Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING WITHOUT

v. PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA

ANDREW SAUL,

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING

Defendant. COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND

16 [ECF No. 2]

18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma 19 pauperis. ECF No. 2. Plaintiff, proceeding through counsel, has submitted a Complaint 20 for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. ECF No. 1 21 (“Compl.”). The Court reviews Plaintiff’s Complaint under U.S.C. § 1915(e), as 22 required when a Plaintiff files a Motion to Proceed IFP. Upon review of Plaintiff’s 23 Motion and Complaint, the Court finds Plaintiff’s Complaint does not sufficiently state a 24 claim for relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed IFP is DENIED WITHOUT 25 PREJUDICE, and Plaintiff’s Complaint is…