Monterroso

Monterroso v. City of San Diego

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 17, 20203:20-cv-00255California2,315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTOPHER MONTERROSO, Case No.: 20-CV-255-CAB-BGS

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

MATTHEW PURDY, [Doc. No. 15] Defendant. 16 17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Matthew Purdy’s motion to dismiss the third amended complaint. The motion has been fully briefed, and the Court deems it suitable for submission without oral argument. For the following reasons, the motion is granted, and the third amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice. I. Background Plaintiff Kristopher Monterroso initiated this lawsuit by filing a pro se complaint against the City of San Diego in San Diego County Superior Court on August 2, 2019. [Doc. No. 1-2 at 2.] On October 10, 2019, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in state court. [Doc. No. 1-2 at 12.] On January 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint that named only Matthew Purdy as the defendant and purported…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.