Alvarez
Alvarez v. LaRose
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20203:20-cv-00782California1,985 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACINTO VICTOR ALVAREZ, JOSEPH Case No.: 3:20-cv-00782-DMS-AHG
BRODERICK, MARLENE CANO, JOSE
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
CRESPO-VENEGAS, NOE
DENYING IN PART
GONZALEZ-SOTO, VICTOR LARA-
RESPONDENTS’ EX PARTE
SOTO, RACQUEL RAMCHARAN,
MOTION TO STAY
GEORGE RIDLEY, MICHAEL JAMIL
IMPLEMENTATION OF ORDER
SMITH, LEOPOLDO SZURGOT, JANE
DOE, on behalf of themselves and those [ECF No. 96] similarly situated, 17 Plaintiffs-Petitioners, 18 v. 19 CHRISTOPHER J. LAROSE, Senior Warden, Otay Mesa Detention Center, et al., 21 Defendants-Respondents.
28 I. BACKGROUND On September 18, 2020, the undersigned issued an Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Petitioners’ Motion for a Rule 34 Site Inspection (the “Discovery Order”). ECF No. 94. On September 20, 2020, Respondents filed a Notice of Intent to File Objection (ECF No. 95) to the Discovery Order pursuant to Fed. R.…