Kirker

Kirker v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 16, 20203:20-cv-00673California2,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

|}. .

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA □ 10 || OSCARK., Case No.: 3:20-cv-00673-LAB-RBM _ ‘Plamtit ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 13 || Vv. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN 14 || ANDREW M. SAUL, COMMISSIONER eee eee costs OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. (Doe. 9] 18 I. INTRODUCTION . On September 12, 2020, Plaintiff Oscar K. (“Plaintiff”) filed an amended complaint under 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s (“Defendant” or “Commissioner’) denial of disability ||insurance benefits and'supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act (“the Act”). (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee and instead 95 || filed an amended motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.