Hampton

Williams v. Hampton

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20203:19-cv-01332California923 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LANCE WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:19-cv-1332-CAB-WVG

CDCR #AG-2394,

ORDER DENYING SECOND

Plaintiff, OBJECTION [Doc. No. 21] vs. 14 SERGEANT S. HAMPTON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Second Objection to Screening, Motion to Recuse Current Judges, Notice of Complaint to Judicial Council and Notice of filing of Amended Complaint” (hereinafter the “Second Objection”). [Doc. No. 21.] For the reasons set forth below, the Second Objection is DENIED. / / / / / / / / / / 28 I. Procedural Background Lance Williams (“Plaintiff”), a prisoner incarcerated at California Men’s Colony (“CMC”) located in San Luis Obispo, California, and proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 17, 2019. [See Compl., Doc. No. 1.] Williams did not prepay the civil filing fee required to commence a civil action at the time he filed his Complaint; instead, he filed a certified copy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.