Kreischer

Kreischer v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20203:18-cv-01034California778 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KRISTY ANN KREISCHER, Case No.: 18-CV-1034 W (RNB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

v. ATTORNEY’S FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) [DOC. 25] ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s counsel Cyrus Safa’s (“Counsel”) motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. §406(b). Counsel requests an order granting him $18,000 in fees, with a credit to Plaintiff for the EAJA fees previously paid in the amount of $2,969.19. On August 13, 2020, Defendant filed a response taking no position on the request, but providing a brief analysis of the fee requested. (See Def’s Response [Doc. 26].) Plaintiff was served with the motion and notified that any response had to be filed within 14 days. (Notice of Mot. [Doc. 25] 2:1–13.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed a response to Counsel’s attorney’s fee request. The Court decides the matter on the papers submitted, and without oral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.