Vashisht-Rota
Vashisht-Rota v. Howell Management Services
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 APARNA VASHISHT-ROTA, an Case No.: 20-CV-321 JLS (KSC) individual,
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT
Plaintiff, PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION v. TO RECONSIDER STAY MOTION
HOWELL MANAGEMENT SERVICES,
(ECF No. 90) a Utah limited liability company; CHRIS HOWELL, an individual; and JUSTIN SPENCER, an individual, 17 Defendants.
Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aparna Vashisht-Rota’s Motion to Reconsider Stay Motion (“Mot.,” ECF No. 90), which was filed ex parte without obtaining a hearing date from chamber. In the very Order Plaintiff now challenges, the Court admonished Plaintiff that “ex parte motions are disfavored,” ECF No. 87 at 3 (quoting Ayestas v. Davis, 584 U.S. __, 138 S. Ct. 1080, 1091 (2018)), and therefore are appropriate only when “‘the moving party’s cause will be irreparably prejudiced if the underlying motion is heard according to regular noticed motion procedures’ and ‘that…