Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. DG in PB, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 15, 20203:18-cv-00840California615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 IN RE OUTLAW LABORATORY, LP Case No.: 18-cv-840-GPC-BGS

LITIGATION.

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL

AND ORDERING MOVANT TO

FILE REDACTED DOCUMENTS.

15 (ECF No. 270.) 16 On August 14, 2020, the Stores moved for leave to file four documents under seal in support of their response to Tauler Smith’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 270. These invoices reflect the proceeds obtained by Tauler Smith, and disbursements made therefrom, while litigating and settling claims advanced on behalf of the alleged association-in-fact enterprise. ECF Nos. 271-1, 271-2, 271-3, 271-4. The Stores offer two reasons for sealing the documents: (1) that they were produced as confidential in line with an existing protective order issued by Magistrate Judge Bernard G. Skomal on June 19, 2020, ECF No. 235, and (2) that Outlaw is concerned filing them without seal would trigger additional litigation from Tauler Smith. ECF No. 271 at 2–4. The reasons put…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.