Ramirez

Ramirez v. Gutierrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20203:20-cv-01109California3,716 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALIVER RAMIREZ, Case No. 20cv1109-MMA-BLM

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

R. GUTIERREZ, et al., [Doc. No. 2] Defendants.

DIRECTING U.S. MARSHAL TO

EFFECT SERVICE OF SUMMONS

AND COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) & 18 Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) 19 20 Plaintiff Aliver Ramirez, currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Compl., Doc. No. 1. Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) but did file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). See Doc. No. 2. I. Motion to Proceed IFP All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.