Gladstone

Kuity Corp v. Gladstone

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20203:19-cv-01529California4,517 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 In re Case No.: 19-CV-1529 JLS (MDD)

12 POSIBA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ORDER (1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION Debtor. TO STRIKE, (2) STRIKING

IMPROPER MATERIALS FROM

RECORD, (3) GRANTING MOTION

TO DISMISS APPEAL, AND

16 (4) DISMISSING AS MOOT APPEAL 17 (ECF Nos. 1, 8, 15-1)

Presently before the Court is the Motion by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London (the “Underwriters”), to Dismiss Appeal by Kuity Corporation (“MTD,” ECF No. 8), in which Appellee Leslie Gladstone joins, see ECF No. 11, as well as Appellant Kuity Corporation’s Response in Opposition to (“Opp’n,” ECF No. 13) and the Underwriters’ Reply in Support of (“Reply,” ECF No. 15) the Motion. Also before the Court is the Underwriters’ Objections to Evidence Filed in Support of Kuity Corporation’s Opposition to Motion to Dismiss Appeal; Motion to Strike (“MTS,” ECF No. 15-1). The Court took the Motion under…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.