Charder

Charder v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 21, 20203:20-cv-01681California2,283 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

1 . 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 |} EMMA C., Case No.: 3:20-cv-01681-RBM Plamtitt ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS 13 || Vv. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN 14 |} ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER OF PREP AVING FERS ORC SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. [Doc. 2] 18 I. INTRODUCTION On August 27, 2020, Plaintiff Emma C. (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 21 || U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of the Commissioner of the Social ||Security Administration’s (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) denial of disability insurance 23 || benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security 24 || Act (“the Act”). (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the required filing fee and instead filed a 25 || motion to proceed in forma pauperis (““IFP Motion”). (Doc. 2.) On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.