Kurin, Inc. v. Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KURIN, INC., Case No.: 3:18-cv-1060-L-LL
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
v. SEAL MAGNOLIA MEDICAL
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
15 Defendant. 16
18 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Kurin, Inc.’s (“Kurin”) motion to seal portions of its memorandum of points and authorities and a deposition excerpt. (Doc. no. 97-1 (“Mot. to Seal”).) Defendant Magnolia Medical Technologies, Inc. (“Magnolia”) did not file an opposition. For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied. Sealing court records implicates the "general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents." Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978). The lack of opposition to a motion to
27 Unless otherwise noted, internal quotation marks, citations, brackets, ellipses and 28 seal therefore does not automatically resolve it. See Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.,…