Ivy

Ivy v. Wingo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20203:20-cv-01345California6,707 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN IVY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01345-CAB-AHG

CDCR #AG-0930,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2]

P. WINGO, Correctional Officer;

K. COTTRELL, Correctional Hearing Lt.; AND

S. ANDERSON, Chief Disciplinary Officer; M. POLLARD, Warden, 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR 18 Defendants. FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b) 20 21 Plaintiff John Ivy, currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) in San Diego, California has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Ivy claims several RJD officials violated his First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights after a contraband phone was discovered in his cell on June 26, 2019. See Compl., ECF No. 1 at 3‒7. Ivy alleges Defendants conspired and retaliated against him and violated his right to due process by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.