Beleche

Beleche v. Diversified Recovery Bureau, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20203:19-cv-02472California766 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

INTRODUCTION

15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Diversified Recovery Bureau’s 16 (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss Plaintiff Alejandra Beleche’s (“Plaintiff”) complaint. See 17 Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff failed to oppose Defendant’s motion. Having carefully considered 18 Defendant’s motion and Plaintiff’s failure to oppose the motion, which the Court construes 19 as consent to grant the motion’s requests, the Court hereby GRANTS Defendant’s 20 unopposed motion to dismiss.

BACKGROUND

22 On November 19, 2019, Plaintiff filed a complaint in California Superior Court, 23 County of San Diego, alleging violations of the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices 24 Act; the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act; and the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. 25 Doc. No. 1-3 at 6. On December 24, 2019, Defendant’s subsequently removed this action 26 to the United States District Court, Southern District of California. See generally Doc. No. 27 1. Defendant filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. 28 Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff failed to respond to the motion. To date, Plaintiff has taken no action in the case. The motion was set for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.