Arellano

Arellano v. Blahnik

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20203:16-cv-02412California1,477 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAUL ARRELLANO, Case No.: 16cv2412-CAB-MSB

Plaintiff,

ORDER: (1) ADOPTING REPORT

v. AND RECOMMENDATION [Doc. No. 160]; (2) REJECTING BLAHNIK, DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS [Doc. Defendant. No. 161]; (3) DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

16 SUMMARY JUDGMENT [Doc. No. 134]; AND (4) SETTING

TELEPHONIC STATUS

CONFERENCE

19 Plaintiff Raul Arellano (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed his complaint in this case on September 23, 2016, alleging Defendant Blahnik (“Defendant”) violated his rights under 42 U.S.C. §1983. [Doc. No. 1.] On December 12, 2019, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. [Doc. No. 134.] On March 5, 2020, Plaintiff filed an opposition. [Doc. No. 150.] On March 13, 2020, Defendant filed a reply. [Doc. No. 151.] On March 30, 2020, Plaintiff filed a sur- reply. [Doc. No. 153.] On July…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.