Carroll

Carroll v. California Department of Corrections

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20203:19-cv-02126California3,686 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 ABONILICO CARROLL, Case No.: 19cv2126-BAS(KSC)

14 Plaintiff, REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION RE

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

DISMISS

CORRECTIONS, et al, 17 Defendants. [Doc. No. 16.]

19 Plaintiff Abonilico Carrol is a prisoner proceeding in this Section 1983 civil rights 20 action pro se and in forma pauperis. [Doc. No. 9.] In his First Amended Complaint 21 (FAC), plaintiff alleges his constitutional rights under the Eighth Amendment were 22 violated by correctional officers at the Richard J. Donovan Correction Facility (RJD).1 23 24

26 Plaintiff refers to this pleading as the Second Amended Complaint. [Doc. No. 20.] However, the Court will construe this pleading as the First Amended Complaint, because 28 [Doc. No. 20, at pp. 2-3.] The Court’s docket indicates plaintiff is currently housed at the North Kern State Prison in Delano, California. [Doc. No. 13.] Defendants C. Wright and S. Miller have filed a Motion to Dismiss. [Doc. No. 4…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.