Lily

Lily v. Cooper

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:19-cv-00745California2,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 “LILY,” JANE DOE, as court appointed Case No.: 19cv745-DMS(AGS) conservator for “SKYLAR” and 12 “SAVANNAH,” minors, JOHN DOE, as REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION FOR court appointed conservator for “SALLY” ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR and “SIERRA,” JANE ROE as next friend for APPROVAL OF MINOR SETTLEMENTS 14 minor, “PIA,” and “JENNY.” [ECF No. 36] Plaintiffs,

16 v. (Unredacted Version Filed Under Seal)

TAY CHRISTOPHER COOPER,

18 Defendant. 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ “Joint Motion to Approve Minor Settlements” (“Joint Motion”). (ECF No. 36 (“J. Mot.”).) This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Dana M. Sabraw pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Civil Rule 17.1 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. After reviewing the Joint Motion and all supporting documents, and for the reasons discussed below, the Court RECOMMENDS that the District Court 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.