Flowrider Surf, Ltd. v. Pacific Surf Designs, Inc.

ee EYAL ENRE YE LER 0 14:1 Nc ec enh Antara Senn . □

.

SEP 2024)

4 GLERK US SISTRIC F COURT [gp 6 .

g UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 || FLOWRIDER SURF, LTD., a Canadian Case No.: 3: 15-cv-01 879-BEN-BLM corporation; and SURF WAVES, LTD., a company incorporated in the United ORDER SETTING AWARD OF 13 || Kingdom, FEES AND COSTS Plaintiffs, [Doc. 309] 15 || 16 || PACIFIC SURF DESIGNS, INC.,a : Delaware corporation, Defendant. . 19 The Court has held that Defendant Pacific Surf Designs, Inc. (“PSD” or |“Defendant”) is entitled to attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. section § 285, as interpreted by ||the Supreme Court in Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc., 134 8. Ct. ||1749, 1756 (2014). In Octane, the Supreme Court eased the…