Manocchio

Manocchio v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:19-cv-00934California7,349 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL M., Case No.: 3:19-cv-00934-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER RESOLVING JOINT

MOTION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW

v.

AND AFFIRMING THE

ANDREW SAUL, COMMISSIONER’S FINAL Commissioner of Social Security, DECISION

Defendant. [ECF No. 26] 17 18 19 20 21

23

25 26 27 28 On May 20, 2020, Plaintiff Michael M. (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, (“Defendant” or “Commissioner”) filed a Joint Motion for Judicial Review of Final Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Joint Motion”) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a decision by the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. ECF No. 26. After a thorough review of the Joint Motion, the administrative record, and applicable law, the Court AFFIRMS the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. I.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.