Rashaad

Rashaad v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:19-cv-01126-MMA-MDDCalifornia528 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DEMETRIUS RASHAAD, Case No. 19-cv-1126-MMA (MDD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER AWARDING EQUAL

v. ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of

EXPENSES PURSUANT TO

Social Security, U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS Defendant. PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920

[Doc. No. 27] 18 On June 17, 2019, Demetrius Rashaad (“Plaintiff”) filed this social security appeal challenging the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits. See Doc. No. 1 ¶¶ 6, 7, 9. The Court referred all matters arising in this social security appeal to the assigned Magistrate Judge for report and recommendation (“R&R”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Civil Local Rule 72.1. See Doc. No. 9. On August 5, 2020, the Magistrate Judge issued a R&R recommending that the Court remand the case for further administrative action to determine whether Plaintiff…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.