Oppedisano

Vaught IV v. Oppedisano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:20-cv-01500California4,210 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELBERT LEE VAUGHT, IV, Case No. 20cv1500-MMA-RBB

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

vs. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS;

ALBERT OPPEDISANO, PhD; [Doc. No. 3] JOHN DOE I, Board Chief Psychologist; 15 CHRISTOPHER HOEFT, Staff Attorney;

DENYING MOTIONS FOR

GEORGE BAKERJIAN, Chief Counsel,

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

17 Defendants. [Doc. Nos. 3, 6]

DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

20 PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) AND § 1915A(b)

22 Plaintiff Elbert Lee Vaught, IV, currently incarcerated at Richard J. Donovan State Prison (“RJD”) located in San Diego, California, and proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff did not prepay the civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), but did file a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”). See Doc. No. 2. Plaintiff has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.