Coolidge

Coolidge v. Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20203:20-cv-01317California2,667 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOMINIC COOLIDGE, Case No.: 3:20-cv-01317-AJB-MSB

CDCR #BC-5720,

ORDER:

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

[ECF No. 2] RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden;

J. SALCIDO, Chief Disciplinary Officer, AND

Defendants. 2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILING TO STATE A CLAIM

PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), (2), 20 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) AND § 1915A(b)(1) 22 Plaintiff Dominic Coolidge, incarcerated at Centinela State Prison (“CEN”) located in Imperial, California, is proceeding pro se in this case with a civil rights Complaint (“Compl.”) filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 1). Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a); instead, he has filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (ECF No. 2). I. Motion to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.