Dong

Dong v. BMW of North America, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20203:19-cv-02202California7,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIYU DONG, Case No.: 19CV02202-DMS (BGS)

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING DISCOVERY

v. DISPUTE

BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC; [ECF 34-35] Defendant. 16 I. INTRODUCTION Pursuant to the Court’s order, (Doc. 33), the parties filed a Joint Statement addressing their positions regarding the Plaintiff taking additional Rule 30(b)(6) depositions. (See Doc. 34). As part of this briefing, the Court ordered the parties to meet and confer to identify the topics Plaintiff sought to have the deponents address. (Doc. 33 at 1-2). From a review of the Joint Statement as well as the attached exhibits and Declaration, the parties did not meet and confer in order to narrow the topics in dispute.1 According to the Defendants, the parties agreed that Defendants would produce 30(b)(6) witnesses to testify about each Defendants’ general knowledge of the Subject Vehicle’s 26 27 1 As regards the topics identified, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.