Carrera Chapple v. Ancestry.com Operations Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:20-cv-01456California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTA CARRERA CHAPPLE Case No.: 20cv1456-LAB (DEB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING

v. UNOPPOSED MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION; AND

ANCESTRY.COM OPERATIONS

INC., et al. ORDER OF DISMISSAL Defendants.

17 Defendant Ancestry.com Operations, Inc. moved to compel arbitration pursuant to Plaintiff Marta Carrera Chapple’s arbitration agreement, which it argued covered all her claims. Plaintiff filed a notice of non-opposition to the motion, but asked the Court to stay the action rather than dismiss it. This case was filed as a putative class action. The Ninth Circuit has directed district courts, when granting motions to compel arbitration, to be as clear as possible whether a dismissal or stay is intended. See Bushley v. Credit Suisse First Boston, 360 F.3d 1149, 1153 n.1 (9th Cir. 2004). Defendant has argued that the class action waiver is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.