Sikking

Sikking v. Housing of Urban Development (HUD)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20203:19-cv-01004California968 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFF SIKKING, et al. Case No.: 19CV1004-LAB (KSC)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION RICHARD C. GRISWOLD, et al. Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs brought this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and other Defendants. Multiple documents attached to the second amended complaint show that their complaint was brought against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and not some related entity with “Chase” in its name. Plaintiffs repeatedly failed to serve this Defendant and to provide proof of service as ordered. First, their process server mailed a copy of the first amended complaint without the summons to an unspecified address. (Docket no. 11.) Then the process server mailed unspecified documents to a local branch of Chase Bank in San Diego. (Docket no. 34.) When Plaintiffs sought entry of default against JPMorgan Chase Bank, the Court issued an order explaining why they had not adequately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.