Dorado
Dorado v. Crumb
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DANIEL DORADO, Case No.: 3:20-cv-1936-JAH-LL Booking No. 19778496,
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL
Plaintiff, ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY
FILING FEE REQUIRED
BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR CATHERINE CRUMB, et al.,
FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED
Defendants. IN FORMA PAUPERIS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)
17 Daniel Dorado (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, and currently housed at the George F. Bailey Detention Facility (“GBDF”), filed a civil rights action. Compl., ECF No. 1. He alleges the trial court lacked jurisdiction in his criminal case. Id. Plaintiff has not prepaid the $400 civil filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), however, and has not filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status All parties instituting any…