Rudden

Rudden v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:20-cv-01759California2,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLAKE R., Case No.: 3:20-cv-1759-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v.

PAUPERIS

ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, [ECF No. 8] 15 Defendant.

17 On September 8, 2020, Plaintiff Blake R. (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against the 18 Commissioner of Social Security, Andrew Saul, seeking judicial review of the 19 Commissioner’s final administrative decision denying his application for Social Security 20 Supplemental Security Income Disability Benefits for lack of disability. ECF No. 1. Along 21 with his Complaint, Plaintiff also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis 22 (“IFP”) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), the 23 Court sua sponte screened Plaintiff’s complaint to evaluate whether his complaint 24 sufficiently stated a claim upon which relief may be granted, and dismissed Plaintiff’s 25 complaint without prejudice as boilerplate and conclusory.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.