Altamirano

Johnson v. Altamirano

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20203:19-cv-01185California4,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 ANTHONY JOHNSON, Case No.: 3:19-cv-01185-H-BLM 12 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE MANUEL ALTAMIRANO, an

COURT’S AUGUST 25, 2020 ORDER

individual; RICHARD TURNER, an

individual; DAVID KINNEY, an [Doc. No. 98.] individual; DAVID HUFFMAN, an individual; PAUL TYRELL, an individual; SEAN SULLIVAN, an 18 individual; STORIX, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1-5, inclusive, Defendants.

On August 25, 2020, the Court granted Defendants Altamirano, Huffman, Kinney, and Turner’s motion for a six-month further stay of the action pending the appeal in Storix, Inc. v. Johnson, No. D075308 (Cal. App., filed Dec. 10, 2018). (Doc. No. 97.) On August 31, 2020, Plaintiff Anthony Johnson filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s August 25, 2020 order. (Doc. No. 98.) On September 14, 2020, Defendants filed a response in opposition to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.