Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. v. Project Management Institute, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20203:18-cv-01927California1,771 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES Case No.: 18cv1927 JM (MSB)

RESEARCH, INC.,

Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ON OBJECTION TO

MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S ORDER

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

INSTITUTE, INC.,

16 Defendant.

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

INSTITUTE, INC., Counter-Claimant, v. WORKPLACE TECHNOLOGIES RESEARCH, INC., and DOES 1-15, 22 Counter-Defendants.

Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Workplace Technologies Research, Inc. (“WTR”) object under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a) to Magistrate Judge Michael S. Berg’s order (Doc. No. 78) extending the deadline to serve request for written discovery. (Doc. No. 80.) Plaintiff Project Management Institute, Inc. (“PMI”) opposes. (Doc. No. 90.) For the below reasons, the objection is OVERRULED. I. BACKGROUND The deadline in the scheduling order to serve written discovery requests expired on August 3, 2020. (See Doc. No. 57.) Due to an “inadvertent and unintentional calendaring 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.