Dang

Dang v. Pontier

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20203:19-cv-01519California3,051 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSEPH DANG d/b/a LAW OFFICE OF Case No.: 19cv1519 GPC(AHG) JOSEPH DANG, an individual`,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

Plaintiff, PONTIER’S MOTION FOR LEAVE v. TO FILE AN AMENDED

COUNTERCLAIM; DENYING

DAVID PONTIER, an individual; PONTIER’S MOTION FOR TEOCO Corporation Group Benefit Plan,

SANCTIONS; RESCHEDULING

a self-funded group health plan; TEOCO

HEARING DATE ON MOTIONS

Corporation, a Delaware Corporation; FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND UMR Inc., a Delaware Corporation; Glenn

MOTION FOR INTERPLEADER

C. Nusbaum, an individual; Paul E. Kim,

DISBURSEMENT

MD Inc., a California corporation; Kevin 19 Yoo, an individual, [Dkt. Nos. 89, 91, 93, 95, 113.] 20 Defendants.

22 Before the Court is Defendant David Pontier’s motion for leave to file an amended 23 counterclaim and three motions for joinder to add JP Morgan Chase Bank, Inc., (Dkt. No. 24 93), Farmers Insurance, Inc., (Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.