Carter

EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:20-cv-01058California8,498 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EPICENTRX, INC., Case No.: 20cv1058-LAB-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING JOINT

v. MOTION FOR ENTRY OF

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE

COREY A. CARTER, M.D.,

ORDER WITH MODIFICATIONS

Defendant. [ECF No. 46]

18 Currently before the Court is the Parties’ “Joint Motion for Entry of [Proposed] 19 Stipulated Protective Order.” ECF No. 46. The Parties represent they have agreed upon the 20 terms of a Protective Order (attached as Exhibit A to this Order) in all respects except for 21 one: whether the Protective Order should contain a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL– 22 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” designation that would preclude Defendant, Dr. Carter, 23 from directly reviewing certain materials with this designation. Id. at 5-6. For the reasons 24 set forth below, the Court: (1) GRANTS Plaintiff’s request for a provision allowing for 25 materials to be designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL–ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY”; 26 and (2) GRANTS the Parties’ Joint Motion…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.