Sargent v. Southern California Edison 401(k) Savings Plan

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MILISSA ANN SARGENT, Case No. 20-cv-1296-MMA (RBB)

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO DISMISS

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON

401(k) SAVINGS PLAN, et al., [Doc. No. 8] Defendants. 16 17 18 Milissa Ann Sargent (“Plaintiff”) alleges three causes of action: (1) an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) claim for benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B); (2) an ERISA breach of fiduciary duty claim pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§ 1104, 1132(a)(3); and (3) declaratory relief. Doc. No. 1 (“Compl.”).1 Defendants Edison 401(k) Savings Plan (“Plan”), Southern California Edison Company Benefits Committee (“Committee”), Plan Administrator of the Edison 401(k) Savings Plan (“Plan Administrator”), and Southern California Edison Company (“Company” or 26 27 28 “SEC”) (collectively, “Defendants”) move to dismiss all claims pursuant to Federal Rule 2 …