Parks
Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNA PARKS; DELBERT PARKS, Case No.: 20-CV-989 TWR (RBB)
Plaintiffs,
ORDER (1) DENYING
v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO
EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY,
ETHICON, INC.; JOHNSON &
AND (2) GRANTING
JOHNSON,
IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
17 (ECF Nos. 34, 36)
Presently before the Court are Defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson’s Motions for Summary Judgment (“MSJ,” ECF No. 34) and to Exclude Certain Case- Specific Opinions of Daniel Elliott, M.D. (“Daubert Mot.,” ECF No. 36). The Court held a hearing on October 15, 2020, at which the Parties agreed to submit the motions on the briefing. (See ECF No. 108.) Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, evidence, and the law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Daubert Motion and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as follows. / / / / / / 28 …