Parks

Parks v. Ethicon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20203:20-cv-00989California6,825 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONNA PARKS; DELBERT PARKS, Case No.: 20-CV-989 TWR (RBB)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER (1) DENYING

v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY,

ETHICON, INC.; JOHNSON &

AND (2) GRANTING

JOHNSON,

IN PART AND DENYING IN PART Defendants. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (ECF Nos. 34, 36)

Presently before the Court are Defendants Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson’s Motions for Summary Judgment (“MSJ,” ECF No. 34) and to Exclude Certain Case- Specific Opinions of Daniel Elliott, M.D. (“Daubert Mot.,” ECF No. 36). The Court held a hearing on October 15, 2020, at which the Parties agreed to submit the motions on the briefing. (See ECF No. 108.) Having carefully considered the Parties’ arguments, evidence, and the law, the Court DENIES Defendants’ Daubert Motion and GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as follows. / / / / / / 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.