Hammett
Hammett v. Sherman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 LAURA LYNN HAMMETT, Case No.: 19-CV-605 TWR (LL)
Plaintiff, ORDER (1) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR
RECONSIDERATION, AND
MARY E. SHERMAN, et al., (2) DENYING AS MOOT Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S EX PARTE MOTION
FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME
16 (ECF Nos. 184, 185)
Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Laura Lynn Hammett’s Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying as Moot Plaintiff’s Motion for Disqualification of the Honorable Janis L. Sammartino (“Reconsideration Mot.,” ECF No. 154) and Ex Parte Motion for Order Shortening Time (“Ex Parte Mot.,” ECF No. 185). Because Plaintiff had sought the disqualification of Judge Sammartino, (see ECF No. 153), her request was mooted by the transfer of this action to the undersigned. See, e.g., Shahin v. Darling, 606 F. Supp. 2d 525, 545 (D. Del.) (denying as moot motion for recusal when case was subsequently reassigned to another judge), aff’d, 350 F.…