Hastings

Hastings v. Ford Motor Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20203:19-cv-02217California2,539 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID HASTINGS, Case No. 19-cv-2217-BAS-MDD

Plaintiff,

ORDER

v. (1) GRANTING IN PART AND FORD MOTOR COMPANY, et al.

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

Defendants. RULE 12(b)(6) MOTION TO

DISMISS THE MAGNUSON-MOSS

WARRANTY ACT CLAIMS; AND

17 (2) DENYING AS MOOT THE RULE 18 56 MOTION AS TO THE SONG- BEVERLY WARRANTY ACT

CLAIMS

(ECF No. 32)

24 Plaintiff David Hastings bought a vehicle from Defendant Ford Motor Company in 2013. Within a year, the vehicle started having various mechanical problems. To repair the vehicle, Mr. Hastings took it to Defendant Ford of Chula Vista and other Ford facilities. The vehicle continued to have mechanical problems after the repair services. When Ford Motor Company declined to buy back the vehicle, Mr. Hastings brought this suit. The Court is asked to decide whether Mr. Hastings states a plausible claim of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.