Taylor

Taylor v. Populus Group, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20203:20-cv-00473California2,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFREY TAYLOR, on behalf of himself Case No. 20-cv-0473-BAS-DEB and other similarly-situated employees,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiff, MOTION TO STRIKE (ECF No. 11) v.

POPULUS GROUP, LLC, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 In this proposed employment class action, Jeffrey Taylor sues his former employer, Populus Group, LLC, for wage and hour claims under the California Labor Code and the Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA), Cal. Lab. Code § 2698 et seq. The Court is asked to strike portions of Mr. Taylor’s Second Amended Complaint under Rule 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court finds the motion suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); Civ. L.R. 7.1(d)(1). Because Populus has not shown that the facts of this case overcome the general presumption against granting Rule 12(f) motions, the Court denies the motion. \\ \\ I. BACKGROUND Mr.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.