Kernan

(PC) Riley v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20203:16-cv-00405California2,319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN E. RILEY, Case No.: 16cv405-MMA-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATION FOR 60-DAY

EXTENSION OF TIME;

S. KERNAN, et al.,

Defendants. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

17 [ECF Nos. 74, 76]

19 Presently before the Court are two motions from Plaintiff, proceeding pro se. ECF Nos. 74, 76. Plaintiff’s first motion, filed on September 25, 2020, seeks “a 60-day extension of time to file additional pleadings, joinder, and amendments.” ECF No. at 1-2 (hereinafter “Motion to Continue”). On September 25, 2020, Plaintiff nunc pro tunc submitted the second motion which seeks “appointment of counsel,” and was accepted by the Court on discrepancy on October 1, 2020. ECF Nos 75, 76 (hereinafter “Motion for Appointment of Counsel”). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel and …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.