Bonilla

Bonilla v. All Reviewing Courts

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 16, 20203:20-cv-01152California1,619 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Case No.: 3:20-cv-01152-LAB-BLM

STEVEN WAYNE BONILLA

J-48500, ORDER:

13 Plaintiff, 1) DENYING MOTION TO 14 v. PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AS BARRED BY 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g)

ALL REVIEWING COURTS,

[ECF No. 4] 16 Defendants. AND

18 2) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING

FEE REQUIRED BY 28 U.S.C.

20 § 1914(a) 21 22 Plaintiff Steven Wayne Bonilla, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison has filed a civil action claiming the “Court has falsely and erroneously claimed” that Plaintiff is a “vexatious litigant.” (Compl. at 1.) On June 29, 2020, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to pay the filing fee required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1914(a) and/or to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a), and granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.