Raiser

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON RAISER, Case No.: 18-CV-1836 JLS (AHG)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION

HON. TIMOTHY CASSERLY, et al.,

Defendants. (ECF No. 72) 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Aaron Raiser’s Ex Parte Application For Reconsideration (“Mot.,” ECF No. 72). Plaintiff asks the Court to reconsider its August 25, 2020 Order in which the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss and dismissed Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint with prejudice. After considering Plaintiff’s arguments and the law, the Court DENIES the Motion. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) permits a party to move a court to alter or amend its judgment. In the Southern District of California, a party may apply for reconsideration “[w]henever any motion or any application or petition for any order or other relief has been made to any judge and has been refused…