Baesel
Baesel v. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BAESEL, individually and on Case No.: 20cv0886 DMS(AGS) behalf of all others similarly situated,
ORDER (1) DENYING
Plaintiffs, DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO v. STRIKE AND (2) DENYING AS
MOOT DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
MUTUAL OF OMAHA MORTGAGE,
STAY DISCOVERY INC., a Delaware corporation 16 Defendant. 17 18 This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiff’s class allegations from the Complaint and Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending a ruling on its other motions. As this Order resolves all of Defendant’s pending motions, the motion to stay discovery is denied as moot. The motion to strike is also denied for the reasons set out below. Defendant argues the class allegations should be stricken because the proposed classes are uncertifiable fail-safe classes, they are not objectively defined, they are / / / / / / / / / overbroad, and they are not…