Dorsey
Dorsey v. Paramo
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20203:20-cv-00843California3,983 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE DORSEY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00843-JAH-LL
CDCR #AF-6022,
ORDER
Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
(ECF No. 6);
D. PARAMO, P. COVELLO, J. JUAREZ,
J. STEWARD, E. BENYARD, S.
AND
ROBERTS, DR. CHAM, DARRYL
BATES, M. GARIKAPARTHI, P.
2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR SHAKIBA, G. CASIAN, V. SILVA, J.
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
BATES, DR. LEE, JOHN DOES 1-10,
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Defendants. 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 20 1915A(b)
23 Plaintiff Jessie Dorsey, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan 24 Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 25 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff alleges that numerous 26 correctional and medical officials at RJD violated his Eighth Amendment rights during the 27 course of approximately seven years of treatment he received for knee and…