Dorsey

Dorsey v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 15, 20203:20-cv-00843California3,983 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE DORSEY, Case No.: 3:20-cv-00843-JAH-LL

CDCR #AF-6022,

ORDER

Plaintiff, 13 vs. 1) GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

(ECF No. 6);

D. PARAMO, P. COVELLO, J. JUAREZ,

J. STEWARD, E. BENYARD, S.

AND

ROBERTS, DR. CHAM, DARRYL

BATES, M. GARIKAPARTHI, P.

2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR SHAKIBA, G. CASIAN, V. SILVA, J.

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

BATES, DR. LEE, JOHN DOES 1-10,

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § Defendants. 1915(e)(2)(B) AND 28 U.S.C. § 20 1915A(b)

23 Plaintiff Jessie Dorsey, currently incarcerated at the Richard J. Donovan 24 Correctional Facility (“RJD”), is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 25 U.S.C. Section 1983. (See ECF No. 1, Compl.) Plaintiff alleges that numerous 26 correctional and medical officials at RJD violated his Eighth Amendment rights during the 27 course of approximately seven years of treatment he received for knee and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.