Baesel

Baesel v. Mutual Of Omaha Mortgage, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 19, 20203:20-cv-00886California2,239 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID BAESEL, individually and on Case No.: 20cv0886 DMS(AGS) behalf of all others similarly situated,

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

Plaintiffs, MOTION TO CHANGE VENUE v.

MUTUAL OF OMAHA MORTGAGE,

15 INC., a Delaware corporation 16 Defendant. 17 18 This case comes before the Court on Defendant’s motion to change venue to the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion, and Defendant filed a reply. For the reasons set out below, the motion is denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff David Baesel is a resident of Parker, Florida. Defendant Mutual of Omaha Mortgage, Inc. is a Delaware corporation with headquarters in San Diego, California. Plaintiff alleges that on April 29, 2014, he registered his cell phone number on the National Do Not Call Registry. (Compl. ¶30.) He further alleges that in January of 2020, he began receiving…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.