Murschel

Murschel v. Paramo

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20203:17-cv-01142California419 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Lance MURSCHEL, Case No.: 17-cv-1142-BTM-AGS Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING JOINT

DISCOVERY PLAN

v. Daniel PARAMO, et al., Defendants. 15 By November 17, 2020, the parties must provide the Court with a Joint Discovery Plan. The JDP must be filed on the CM/ECF system and lodged with Magistrate Judge Schopler by emailing it to efile_Schopler@casd.uscourts.gov. Because defendants raised the issue of failure to exhaust, the Plan should offer a brief schedule to adjudicate that issue before moving on to general discovery. See Albino v. Baca, 747 F.3d 1162, 1170 (9th Cir. 2014) (“Exhaustion should be decided, if feasible, before reaching the merits of a prisoner’s claim.”). The JDP must identify if good cause exists to modify the Court’s tentative schedule of deadlines, which is as follows: 24 25 26 27 28 Event Deadline Defense Counsel Receiving and December 8, 2020 Serving All Grievances on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.