Carter

EpicentRx, Inc. v. Carter

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaOctober 20, 20203:20-cv-01058California3,162 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EPICENTRX, INC., Case No.: 20cv1058-TWR-LL

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO QUASH

COREY A. CARTER, M.D, [ECF No. 53] Defendant. 16 Currently before the Court is the Parties’ Joint Motion for Determination of a Discovery Dispute. ECF No. 53. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion to Quash. RELEVANT BACKGROUND The instant dispute arises from Defendant’s deposition subpoena of Plaintiff’s former in-house general counsel, Sarah Hibbard. ECF No. 53 at 3. Defendant contends Ms. Hibbard’s testimony is necessary for the limited purpose of opposing Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify [ECF No. 40]. Id. I. Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualify On August 27, 2020, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Disqualify defense counsel Guy A. Ricciardulli, Donald McKillop, and their respective law firms, from representing 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.